< It's endless because:
1) it is not easily verifiable. We can only make inferences.
2) for all the complexities there are, an evolutionist’s only backup is that there is “always” a chance for an improbable event to happen. When should something be discarded as it approaches improbable numbers?
3) we can’t redo macro evolution for it to be believable.
>> We can redo macro evolution.
We even have done it with the miller experiment, the amino acid creation experiment.
< There’s problems with that experiment.
[need details]
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
